Learn How To Read Arabic in 24 hours or less

Tag: Islamic Law

Can I give Zakat to several people?

Question: Can I give Zakat to several people?

Answer: You can give all of your zakat to one person as long as he/she is eligible. You may also divide up your zakat and pay it to several people, as long as they are eligible under one of the eight categories.

For example: You have 300 USD to give as Zakat, you can give 300 to one person or divide it up amongst a group of people from one category, 5 debtors for example, each getting 60 USD each. You can also divide it up amongst eligible people of several categories, i.e. 1 poor person, 1 debtor, 1 refugee, 1 new muslim, etc.

And Allah knows best.

Deconstructing Islamic Law – Categories of Islamic Law

Continuing along the lines of deconstructing Islamic Law, I thought I would outline here the high-level categories of Islamic law as laid out in most Islamic legal texts.

#1 – Binary

Islamic law can be look at in a binary sense, i.e. with two main categories:

  1. ‘Ibadat – Acts of Devotion
    This includes prayer, purity (being a condition for prayer), fasting, pilgrimage, customs, food and drink, in general all of those things that are done out of personal conviction in devotion to God.
  2. Mu’amalat – Civil actions
    Business, loans, partnerships, Criminal law, family law, the judiciary, international relations, etc… in general all of those things which involve interacting with other human beings.

#2 – another binary form
Islamic Law can also be categorized into another binary form

  1. Usul – Fundamentals
  2. Furu’ – secondary issues

In this categorization, law is looked at in the bigger picture, taking into consideration the basis for which the individual laws were formed. this is similar to the differentiation between postive and natural law.

#3 – Trinary

  1. ‘Ibadat – Acts of Devotion
  2. Mu’amalat – Civil actions
  3. Customs – this differs here from #1 in that customs are not necessarily acts of devotion, but are regulated in that they usually involve society as a whole. It also differs with mu’malat in that there is generally no communative or charitable ‘exchange’ going on here, even though there is a cultural one.

#4- quaternary

  1. ‘Ibadat – Acts of Devotion
  2. Mu’amalat – Civil actions
  3. al-ankiHah or Fiqh al-Usrah – Family Law
  4. Fiqh al-Jinayat – Penal law

#5 – quinternary

  1. ‘Ibadat – Acts of Devotion
  2. Mu’amalat – Civil actions
  3. al-ankiHah or Fiqh al-Usrah – Family Law
  4. Fiqh al-Jinayat – Penal law
  5. al-Siyar – International relations

#6 – septenary

  1. ‘Ibadat – Acts of Devotion
  2. Mu’amalat – Civil actions
  3. al-ankiHah or Fiqh al-Usrah – Family Law
  4. ‘Ilm al-QaDa’ – Judicial law (including arbitration)
  5. Fiqh al-Jinayat – Penal law
  6. al-Siyar – International relations
  7. al-Siyasah -literally politics, but here meaning domestic affairs

Deconstructing Islamic Law – Focus on Fiqh texts (2)

Last time we looked at Fiqh texts we mentioned:

If we look at them substantially, they consist of:

  1. textually gleaned understandings (i.e. from Quran and Hadith)
  2. issues of consensus
  3. opinions of the companions an/or their students
  4. opinions of the “Imam” of that particular school
  5. and at times opinions of the leaders of that Imam’s school after him

This time I’d like to discuss each of these in brief:

1. Textually gleaned understandings

This first category is made up of understandings taken from the texts of the Quran and Sunnah. Both of these contain texts which can generally be divided up into three categories:

A. Texts which are explicit and unequivocal in nature, i.e. they will not and cannot hold more than one meaning without deviating from their true linguistic meanings and invoking some type of heterodox interpretation. This category is know as a “Nass” (نصّ).

And example of this would be the verse (وَآتُواْ حَقَّهُ يَوْمَ حَصَادِهِ ) “And give its right the day of Harvest…” 6:141. The meaning taken from this verse is that zakat is due on crops the day they are harvested. No one can rightfully construe this verse to mean something other than that apparent without invoking an interpretation that would not only be foreign to the corpus of Islamic legal understanding but to the Arabic Language as well.

An example of deviant misinterpretation of the Quran would be construing this verse (إِنَّ اللّهَ يَأْمُرُكُمْ أَنْ تَذْبَحُواْ بَقَرَةً ) “…God orders you to slaughter a cow…” 2:67, which was directed to the Children of Israel at the time of Moses to mean that God has ordered the slaughter of Aisha, the wife of the Prophet Muhammad. Such an interpretation is neither logical nor in accordance with sane readings of the texts legally or linguistically.

B. Texts which contain more than one meaning, yet one of these is presumed stronger than the other. This is called a “Zahir” text (ظاهر).

An example of this would be the hadith narrated by Muslim:

“For every forty sheep, a sheep.” (في أربعين شاة شاة)

The apparent meaning of this hadith is that a Shepard who owns forty sheep must pay one sheep as Zakat. Other scholars said that the meaning of this hadith is that he must pay the price of one sheep as zakat, not that he is obligated to pay the actual sheep. Regardless of Juristic polemics surrounding the issue at hand, when analyzed singularly the strength of first meaning is more presumptuous than that of the second.

C. Texts which contain multiple meanings, it being impossible to designate one of these meanings without an external texts or meaning to help determine it. This type is called “Mujmal” (مجمل). The process by which it is clarified is called “Bayan” (بيان). It is then known as a “Mubayyan” (مبين) text.

For example the 3rd verse of Surah al- Mujadilah

(وَالَّذِينَ يُظَاهِرُونَ مِن نِّسَائِهِمْ ثُمَّ يَعُودُونَ لِمَا قَالُوا فَتَحْرِيرُ رَقَبَةٍ مِّن قَبْلِ أَن يَتَمَاسَّا)
“Those that commit Zihar from their wives then return to that which they said must free a slave before they reunite…”

The description of the slave here is an unknown, is it a believing slave as mentioned in other verse (4:92) or not? Does a slave who is impaired count? and so on and so forth. Some would say that in this instance we must look at similar instances in the texts, and judge the ambiguity of this text by the explicitly of the others. Other disagreed.

The point in all of this is that the multiplicity of opinion based on B & C is found in works of Fiqh, and fiqh texts become the junction of linguistic, inductive, and logical arguments; these all leading to the categories following this first one.

Deconstructing Islamic Law – Focus on Fiqh texts (1)

fiqh booksFiqh texts are made up of various components:

I. If we look at them compositely they contain:

  1. definitions
  2. rulings
  3. examples
  4. exceptions

II. If we look at them substantially, they consist of:

  1. textually gleaned understandings (i.e. from Quran and Hadith)
  2. issues of consensus
  3. opinions of the companions an/or their students
  4. opinions of the “Imam” of that particular school
  5. and at times opinions of the leaders of that Imam’s school after him

III. And if we look at them structurally then they consist of:

  1. chapters
  2. sections
  3. and subsections

With the latter being pretty obvious, the rulings that were expressed throughout those chapters, etc . and compose “Fiqh” were gathered to create a new form of text: al-Ashbah wa ‘l-NaZa’ir. These texts were not categorized like fiqh texts, even though they deal directly with the same substance of fiqh. Instead “ashbah” or “semblances” and “naZa’ir” or “relations” were correlated. Rulings that resemble each other were analyzed along side each other, and others which were related but did not have the same outcome were as well. From these the science of Qawaid Fiqhiyyah developed (for an excellent article on the subject look here). Some of these works were intra-school works, while others were comprehensive of different schools.

Other texts were created from Fiqh texts as well, such as the texts that deal with the “Mufradat” of a particular school and its Imam. Perhaps the most famous of all Imams in his “Mufradat” (i.e. issue in which he held a singular opinion) is Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal. This was for several reasons, one being that he was the latest of the four Imams to have a codified school gain prominence, as well as the fact that he was the one Imam from the four that narrated the most hadith, in addition to his keenness to collect the opinions of those scholars that preceded him, especially those of Ahl al-Hadith.

A third type of text was created out of fiqh texts, that of “Furuq” or differentiation between rulings, definitions, and exceptions. These works, although few in number, detail the differences between seemingly similar things, their exceptions, and the reasoning behind that. These texts are closely related to those of “Qawaid fiqhiyyah” and as such many of the early authors of such texts were those that gained prominence for their “Qawaid” writings in both fiqh and Usul.

The Root – What is Shariah, Exactly?

Succinct and to the point.

What Is Sharia, Exactly?

By: Afi-Odelia Scruggs
Posted: August 27, 2010 at 5:06 PM
Some critics of plans to build a mosque near Ground Zero warn that the imam behind it wants to bring Islamic Sharia law to the U.S. Before we decide to fear it, let’s at least understand what Sharia means.

For opponents of an Islamic cultural center near Ground Zero, the word Sharia symbolizes the threat of Islam. Marchers rallying against the center depicted the word in dripping red script, as if drenched in blood. Newt Gingrich has lectured about the problem of “creeping Sharia.” Blogs such as Jihad Watch and Atlas Shrugs allege a conspiracy to replace the Constitution with Sharia.

What is Sharia? Simply put, it is Islamic law. Sharia governs acts of worship, such as prayer and fasting, as well as civil and criminal matters, such as marriage, inheritance or criminal transactions. But that’s only one aspect of Sharia.

“Sharia is three things: an ideal religious concept, a body of jurisprudence done by groups of scholars, and legislation in Muslim countries,” says Kecia Ali, an assistant professor of religion at Boston University.

In abstract, Sharia is God’s will for humanity. Sharia means “the path” that God wants people to travel. The proper way of life is shown primarily through two sources. The most important one is the Quran, which Muslims believe was given to the Prophet Muhammad by the angel Gabriel. The other one is the activities of the prophet, which are recorded in the Sunna.

Merely consulting those texts doesn’t guarantee heading in the right direction. “If you wanted to know what kinds of food you could and couldn’t eat, maybe you asked somebody who was a legal authority. You wouldn’t go trying to sort out the answer for yourself,” Ali says.

Like Judaism, Islam has specialists who can rule on religious matters. When interpreting a law, the jurists refer to the Quran, the prophetic tradition and established scholarship. They also take into consideration community and cultural practices and apply reasoning to the problem at hand.

For example, a questioner might ask whether drinking beer is allowed. Although the Quran doesn’t mention beer, drinking wine is prohibited. Jurists would deconstruct that prohibition in making their decision, says Imam Ramez Islambouli, who teaches at John Carroll University near Cleveland.

“Scholars would say, ‘Is it because of color [of the wine] … or is it because of its impact, the intoxication?’ ” he says. “Then we see, by analogy, beer has the same impact. Thus beer is prohibited in Islam.”

Though people might think that Sharia is a fixed, rigid set of rules dating back to the seventh century, it is the product of centuries of human reasoning and interactions between Muslims and non-Muslims.

The third meaning of Sharia refers to legislation in Muslim countries. “People talk about Sharia law in Egypt, in Pakistan, in Morocco, and they mean the civil codes that national legislatures vote on,” Ali says.

The codes aren’t strictly Islamic but are byproducts of colonial regimes. Ali says that remnants of British and French law are found in India and Morocco, while a good portion of Turkish law is taken from the Swiss civil code.

“These kinds of rules call themselves ‘Sharia.’ It’s part of how they seek to claim legitimacy for what they’re doing,” Ali says. “But they go through a very different mechanism than traditional jurisprudence or from the purely religious thing.”

Sharia is also implemented under the American legal system, Islambouli says. For example, an Islamic marriage requires witnesses, recitation of vows and a dowry. But a couple also must get a license before the ceremony.

“We wouldn’t perform the ceremony unless they had a license, because American law would not recognize a religious marriage,” he says.

Is zakat for non-Muslims?

Can Zakat be given to Non-Muslims?

There is general agreement that Zakat is not to be given to anyone who is fighting against Islam and Muslims; this is a point that does not need much elaboration. As for others who are non-combatant, and do not show enmity towards Islam and Muslims then medieval scholars differed as to whether such a person can be given Zakat.

Ibn al-Mundhir, in his influential work al-Ijma’, mentions the following:

وأجمعوا على أن الذمي لا يعطى من زكاة الأموال شيئا

They have consensus that the Dhimmi[1]
is not to be given anything from Zakat of wealth.

Given the relation of this point of consensus, many scholars followed Ibn al-Mundhir stating that non-Muslims should not be given Zakat. It is important to note here that the same set of scholars who followed this opinion reiterated the necessity of using other non-Zakat funds for the welfare of non-Muslims.

Looking at Ibn al-Mundhir’s statement, and despite the frankness of his assertion, a cursory review of the literature on Zakat shows that in fact there are variant opinions on this topic.

In summary, there are four opinions on giving Zakat to non-Muslims:

-         Opinion #1: Zakat cannot to be given to non-Muslims in any way shape or form, not even under the account of “those whose hearts are softened”.

  • This opinion is the official position of the Hanafi school.
  • Basis: Several reports that Umar refused to give Zakat to several people after Islam had become strong.

-         Opinion #2: Zakat should only be given to non-Muslims under the account of “those whose hearts are softened”.

  • This is the official stance of the other 3 schools.
  • Basis: Narrations  exist where the Prophet gave non-Muslims Zakat to entice them to become Muslims.

-         Opinion #3: That Zakat should only be given to non-Muslims in the absence of eligible Muslims.

  • This was the opinion of Mujahid, the student of Ibn Abbas. [2]
  • Basis: The hadith of Muadh states “..taken from their wealthy and given to their rich…”, poor non-Muslims being members of communities in which rich Muslim might live.

-         Opinion #4: That Zakat may be given to any person fitting the description given in the verse of Zakat, regardless of whether this person be Muslim or non-Muslim.

  • This was related from Umar, Jabir and Zufar (from the Hanafi school) and others.
  • Basis:
    • The generality of the verses on Zakat and charity, which do not in themselves specify one type of person over the other, and instead designate categories.
    • Umar was asked about the verse “Charity is only for the destitute…” He said: “They are the disabled from the People of the Book”.[3]
    • Jabir ibn Zaid, the famous jurist from the Tabi’in, was asked “Where should be distribute our Zakat?” He replied: “To the destitute amongst Muslims and Dhimmis.” He then stated “God’s Messenger would distribute to the Dhimmis from both Zakat and al-Khumus”.[4]

The fourth opinion fits not only the generality of the verse, but the broadest understanding possible of the hadith of Muadh, as well as fitting in with the explanation of Umar of the verse. It would seem that the unequivocal nature of Ibn al-Mundhir’s statement, as well as its precision, is highly debatable and due further research.


[1] – A dhimmi is a non-Muslim citizen of the Islamic state

[2] – Ibn abi Shaibah, Al-Musannaf, 3/177.

[3] – Ibn abi Shaibah, Al-Musannaf, 3/178.

[4] – Ibn abi Shaibah, Al-Musannaf, 3/178.

Zakat Workshop – Tomorrow

One more day till we start our Zakat Workshop here in Houston:

  • It’ll be an interactive course, so no spoon-fed information.
  • All attendees will be expected to participate and give feedback.
  • Each day will build on the previous, so be sure not to miss any.
  • Admission is $50, all of which will go to local charities.